An in-depth look at Act II
 
 
         The second act of Shakespeare's A midsummer night's dream is not the most serious of the acts, nor is it the most comedic; but it is, however, a very vital piece of the play. As the act begins with the meeting of two fantastical characters that, at first glance, are completely oblivious to the conflicts of act one. Shakespeare creates a gap between fantasy and reality, not only with characters within the act, but settings as well. He uses the forest to represent a removal of all human inhibitions, when the characters leave a city so realistic as Athens and enter the forest they become as fantastical as the fairies, with this Shakespeare bridges the gap between reality and fantasy. This bridge also unifies the first and second act within the play, and setting a stage for the rest of the play.  
  
         The next idea played with by Shakespeare is the thin line between love and hate within the characters. As the people change their love interests or are the result of a mistake, they find themselves in many physical conflicts. The fantasy characters are not exempt from these unfortunate happenings either. Puck is a servant throughout this act, and when he does something for Oberon he is not to enthralled with his job. This, unfortunately, spelled comedy and irony for the rest of the characters within the play.  
  
         The acts are bridges in another way too, as each character seems to have a double in the worlds of fantasy and reality, or Athens and the forest. Oberon is like Theseus, Puck is like Philostrate, Titania is like Hippolyta. This helps connect the acts and further unifies the worlds of each character. This act also begins a theme that is very crucial to the play; that it is a dream within a dream, and the reader, or viewer, is slowly sucked into this world created from the meeting of four different worlds The world of Theseus and Hippolyta, the world of the lovers, the world of the Great unwashed, and the world of the fairies.  
  
         The second act really helps perpetuate the conflicts of the first act and draw the reader/viewer towards the resolution, in addition to demonstrating some of the many themes threaded within the dialogue. Shakespeare uses the second act as a vital building block for the play.